General Forum

46 votes

Separation of Marriage and State

The United States were founded on the principle of individual liberty and responsibility. For this reason rights are afforded only to individuals and not to groups of people regardless of whether they are a group of two people or a large corporation.

I believe the most sensible and fair solution... more

  1. Comments
  1. 3

    Look at how diverse the support for this idea could be.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygamy#Patterns_of_occurrence_across_religions

  2. 3

    Agree completely; I propose this here....it is complex but the direction in which the country must go. It's an IDEA whose time has come and NO ONE can stop it...wake up GOP.
    http://llph.typepad.com/life_liberty_the_pursuit_/2008/06/separation-of-marriage-state.html

  3. 3

    I strongly support your position. A major problem, however, is money. The government is effectively paying my wife and me $500,000 to be married. Increased Army housing allowance; joint income tax filing; Social Security payments to my wife only because she is my wife; spousal exemption on inheritance; and many etc. Terribly unfair to single folks who have to pay for all this.

  4. 3

    Marriage is about love, not property rights and taxation. To call a civil union between two heterosexuals "marriage" is idiotic. Marriage is a personal and a religious issue, it's not a government issue. Civil unions between any two people should be recognized, but recognition of marriage should be left up to God and the community.

  5. 3

    In addition to the ability to combine or consolidate ideas, I would also like the ability to vote down certain ideas as well.

  6. It'd be very nice if there were a way for us to combine suggestions, as I think you and I proposed something similar here!

powered by UserVoice